Your AI agents handle money, data, and decisions at machine speed. Current guardrails hope to catch problems. Ours mathematically prove every rule was followed — before damage is done.
The problem
AI agents don't just assist anymore. They transact, approve, and spend autonomously at machine speed, often with no human in the loop. A vulnerability that steals $1,000 in a human-speed system steals $10 million in a machine-speed system. Not because it's worse, but because it executes thousands of times faster than anyone can respond. If your agent executes 1,000 transactions per second and your team needs 60 seconds to investigate an alert, that's 60,000 potentially fraudulent transactions before you even understand what's happening.
Current guardrails aren't enough
Today's AI security relies on guardrails, monitoring, and policy enforcement. All three were designed for systems where a human is watching. Agentic commerce has no one watching. LLM-based safety judges inherit the same vulnerabilities as the AI they're checking. If an attacker can trick the agent, they can trick the guardrail too. And monitoring is reactive. By the time a dashboard flags unusual activity, thousands more compromised transactions have already gone through.
Why math, not monitoring
Visa doesn't trust that a card is legitimate. It cryptographically verifies it. Banks don't hope wire amounts weren't tampered with. They prove it mathematically. AI commerce needs the same standard. Cryptography turns trust problems into math problems. Math doesn't care about prompt injection, social engineering, or sophisticated attacks. The proof is valid or it isn't. No confidence scores. No "88% blocked." The shift is from observation to verification. From watching to knowing.
Built for Production
Use cases
Founders: Wyatt Benno, Houman Shadab.
©2026 ICME Inc. All Rights Reserved.